nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 09, v.65 6-9
炎症负担指数对急性心力衰竭患者疾病转归的预测价值
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email): Weilan20180507@163.com;
DOI:
摘要:

目的 探讨炎症负担指数(IBI)对急性心力衰竭患者疾病转归的预测价值。方法 选择急性心力衰竭患者120例,入院后采集外周静脉血测算IBI。收集患者临床资料,采用多因素Logistic回归分析影响急性心力衰竭患者预后不良的影响因素,绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析IBI对急性心力衰竭患者预后不良的预测价值。结果 120例患者中出院后1年内预后不良26例、预后良好94例。预后不良者的IBI高于预后良好者(P<0.05)。单因素分析结果,预后不良者NYHA分级、外周血中白蛋白、N末端B型脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)、C反应蛋白、中性粒细胞计数均高于预后良好者,左心室射血分数(LVEF)、淋巴细胞计数水平均低于预后良好者(P均<0.05);多因素分析结果,NYHA分级Ⅱ~Ⅲ级(OR=1.747)及血清NT-proBNP>3 354.25 pg/mL(OR=2.678)、LVEF≤44.25%(OR=3.459)、IBI>27.54(OR=4.367)均为急性心力衰竭患者预后不良的危险因素(P均<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,IBI预测急性心力衰竭患者预后不良的曲线下面积为0.845(95%CI:0.795~0.896)。结论 急性心力衰竭预后不良患者IBI异常升高;IBI对急性心力衰竭患者预后不良具有一定预测效能。

Abstract:

Objective To explore the predictive value of the inflammatory burden index(IBI) for the prognosis of patients with acute heart failure. Methods A total of 120 patients with acute heart failure were selected. Peripheral venous blood was collected from the patients after admission to calculate the IBI. The clinical data of the patients were collected. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors for the poor prognosis of patients with acute heart failure. The receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was drawn to analyze the predictive value of IBI for the poor prognosis of patients with acute heart failure. Results Among the 120 patients, 26 had a poor prognosis within one year after discharge and 94 had a good prognosis. The IBI of patients with poor prognosis was higher than that of patients with good prognosis(P<0. 05). The results of univariate analysis showed that the NYHA classification, albumin, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide(NT-proBNP), C-reactive protein, and neutrophil count in the peripheral blood of patients with poor prognosis were higher than those of patients with good prognosis, while the left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) and lymphocyte count were lower(all P<0. 05). The results of multivariate analysis showed that NYHA classification Ⅱ-Ⅲ (OR=1. 747), serum NT-proBNP > 3354. 25 pg/mL(OR=2. 678), LVEF ≤ 44. 25%(OR=3. 459), and IBI > 27. 54(OR=4. 367) were all risk factors for the poor prognosis of patients with acute heart failure(all P<0. 05). The ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve(AUC) of IBI in predicting the poor prognosis of patients with acute heart failure was 0. 845(95% CI: 0. 795-0. 896). Conclusion IBI is abnormally elevated in acute heart failure patients with poor prognosis, and IBI has a certain predictive value for the poor prognosis in patients with acute heart failure.

参考文献

[1] COX Z L, COLLINS S P, HERNANDEZ G A, et al. Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in patients with acute heart failure[J].J Am Coll Cardiol, 2024, 83(14):1295-1306.

[2] MCDONAGH T A, METRA M, ADAMO M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure[J]. Eur Heart J, 2021, 42(36):3599-3726.

[3]王薇,雷璐碧,赵倩,等.急性心力衰竭再入院及死亡风险预测模型研究进展[J].中华流行病学杂志,2023,44(12):2005-2011.

[4]李敬,郝盼盼.急性心力衰竭患者出入院心率变化与预后相关性[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2025,63(4):75-82.

[5]王朋飞,裴源源,石芳娥,等.急诊急性心力衰竭单元收治患者出院后6个月内再入院率和病死率分析[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2022,31(7):886-894.

[6] XIE H, RUAN G, WEI L, et al. The inflammatory burden index is a superior systemic inflammation biomarker for the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer[J]. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle,2023, 14(2):869-878.

[7]汪婧媛.血液炎症复合指标与非小细胞肺癌患者免疫治疗预后的相关性研究[D].太原:山西医科大学,2023.

[8]卫晓霜,陈信浩.炎症负荷指数预测混合型肝细胞癌-胆管癌患者预后的临床意义[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2024,29(11):1047-1051.

[9]中国医疗保健国际交流促进会急诊医学分会,中华医学会急诊医学分会,中国医师协会急诊医师分会,等.急性心力衰竭中国急诊管理指南(2022)[J].临床急诊杂志,2022,23(8):519-547.

[10]张裕,姚欢,毛玲珠,等.估计血浆容量状态和左心房内径对急性心力衰竭患者预后的预测价值[J].中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志,2024,19(11):1409-1412.

[11]蔡美莲,钟国强.盐酸奥普力农注射液联合注射用重组人脑利钠肽治疗扩张型心肌病所致急性心力衰竭效果观察[J].山东医药,2023,63(31):72-74.

[12] SHEEHAN M, SOKOLOFF L, REZA N. Acute heart failure:from the emergency department to the intensive care unit[J]. Cardiol Clin, 2024, 42(2):165-186.

[13]王萌,刘利欣,杨旭芬,等.国家预警评分系统联合白蛋白预测急性心力衰竭患者不良预后的价值[J].心肺血管病杂志,2024,43(7):695-699.

[14]严晓燕,曾卓华,李凯,等.血清指标联合超声心动图检查对老年急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭的预测价值[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2024,26(11):1272-1276.

[15] ZHU Q, ZHANG Q, CHEN C, et al. C-reactive protein, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and long-term mortality in Chinese centenarians[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2023, 6(10):2340307.

[16] WITTERMANS E, VAN DE GARDE E M, VOORN G P, et al.Neutrophil count, lymphocyte count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in relation to response to adjunctive dexamethasone treatment in community-acquired pneumonia[J]. Eur J Intern Med, 2022, 96:102-108.

[17] ZHANG C, HE H, CHEN X, et al. The prediction of lymphocyte count and neutrophil count on the efficacy of Xuebijing adjuvant treatment for severe community-acquired pneumonia:a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial[J]. Phytomedicine,2023, 110:154614.

[18]周晚晴,李靓,杨洋.外周血中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值联合C反应蛋白对急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者经皮冠脉介入术后主要不良心脏事件的预测价值[J].中国医药导报,2022,19(17):67-70.

[19]梁翠丹,罗且宁,王巍潼,等.收缩压、血糖、中性粒细胞计数、淋巴细胞计数对高血压性脑出血预测价值[J].安徽医药,2023,27(2):271-276.

[20]漆星月,赵旭东,李雷.炎症负荷指数与吉兰-巴雷综合征严重程度的相关性分析[J].中华全科医学,2024,22(9):1487-1490.

[21]朱琳,路宁,杨琳,等.炎症负荷指数在结直肠癌诊断和预后中的临床价值[J].中国癌症防治杂志,2023,15(5):543-548.

[22]杨琳,路宁,温华,等.炎症负荷指数与胃癌临床关系研究[J].国际肿瘤学杂志,2024,51(5):274-279.

[23] XIE H, WEI L, RUAN G, et al. AWGC 2023 cachexia consensus as a valuable tool for predicting prognosis and burden in Chinese patients with cancer[J]. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle,2024, 15(5):2084-2093.

[24]徐莲,庄光彤,秦亚录,等. Notch1/Jagged1信号通路在慢性心力衰竭免疫炎症相关发病机制中的研究进展[J].重庆医学,2024,53(2):291-296.

[25]涂哲禹,苏丰贺,王艺婷,等.急性心力衰竭代谢标志物的研究进展[J].中华医学杂志,2023,103(1):67-70.

基本信息:

DOI:

中图分类号:R541.6

引用信息:

[1]谭艳杰,李学远.炎症负担指数对急性心力衰竭患者疾病转归的预测价值[J].山东医药,2025,65(09):6-9.

基金信息:

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文